User Psychology #3: Confirmation Bias

Read Time: 4 min

Welcome to Product Monk, a 3x/week newsletter where we share the case studies of the most exciting tech products.

Some of our recent posts:

• Case Study: Build a Sport-related Product for Meta (Facebook)

• Decoding Google Plus' Downfall and Strategies for Revival

• User Psychology #2: BJ Fogg's Behavioral Model

What is the Confirmation Bias User Psychology?

Confirmation bias is a cognitive bias that refers to the tendency of people to seek, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms their preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.

It is a type of selective thinking that can lead individuals to disregard or downplay evidence that contradicts their viewpoints while giving more weight to information that aligns with what they already believe.

This bias can occur both consciously and unconsciously and affects people across various domains of life, including politics, religion, personal relationships, and decision-making processes.

Confirmation bias can have significant implications in user psychology, particularly in the context of online interactions, social media, and information consumption.

In the digital age, people have access to an overwhelming amount of information, and they often gravitate toward sources and content that reinforce their existing beliefs and values. This can create echo chambers, where individuals are surrounded by like-minded people and ideas, further reinforcing their biases.

In user psychology, confirmation bias can manifest in several ways:

1.  Information seeking: Users may actively seek out information that confirms their existing beliefs, ignoring or avoiding contradictory perspectives.

2. Information evaluation: Users might be more critical of information that challenges their beliefs, looking for flaws or biases in opposing viewpoints while accepting supporting evidence uncritically.

3. Selective sharing: Users may be more likely to share content that aligns with their beliefs, contributing to the spread of biased information in their social circles.

4. Polarization: Confirmation bias can contribute to the polarization of online communities, where individuals become more entrenched in their views and less open to understanding opposing perspectives.

5. Misinterpretation: Users may interpret ambiguous or vague information in a way that aligns with their existing beliefs.

Why Should PMs Learn it?

Below are reasons why product managers should learn about confirmation bias.

1. Objective Decision-making

   Learn confirmation bias to make data-driven decisions. Example: Choosing features based on user data rather than personal preferences.

2. User-Centric Approach

   Understand confirmation bias to better grasp user needs. Example: Conduct unbiased user research to gather accurate feedback.

3. Mitigating Risk

   Address confirmation bias to reduce the risk of investing in the wrong features. Example: Testing assumptions before launching a new product.

4. Improving Collaboration

   Foster open communication by acknowledging confirmation bias. Example: Encouraging team members to challenge ideas constructively.

5. Adaptability and Learning

   Overcome confirmation bias for continuous product improvement. Example: Iterating features based on user feedback.

6. Effective Stakeholder Management

   Present well-researched data to build credibility. Example: Using market research to support product strategy proposals.

7. Avoiding Biased Assumptions

   Be aware of confirmation bias to avoid biased decisions. Example: Considering both positive and negative reviews to assess a product's performance.

8. Ethical Product Development

   Avoid harmful stereotypes by understanding confirmation bias. Example: Ensuring inclusivity in product design to cater to diverse user groups.

Sample Scenario of Confirmation Bias

Meet Emily, a regular user of a food delivery app that allows customers to order food from various restaurants.

After trying out a new restaurant for the first time, Emily had a disappointing experience. The food took longer to arrive than expected, and when it did, it was not as fresh and flavorful as she had hoped.

Confirmation Bias Influence:

Emily decides to leave a review of her experience with the food delivery app. However, due to confirmation bias, her review is heavily influenced by her initial negative impression. She focuses primarily on the negative aspects of her experience and fails to acknowledge any redeeming qualities of the restaurant.

In her review, Emily emphasizes the long delivery time, the lack of freshness in the food, and her overall disappointment. She may even exaggerate some of the negative aspects due to the emotional impact of her initial experience.

On the other hand, Emily overlooks any potential extenuating circumstances that may have contributed to the poor experience.

For example, she does not consider that there could have been unexpected delays beyond their control.

How can Product Monk help you become a better PM? 

To answer this, consider filling out the survey. We will always strive to provide the maximum value you seek.

Reader Survey Form

This is just a basic survey form to know you, our reader 🧑‍🏫 a little bit better. This will help us curate a better and more relevant reading experience for you.